The Top 100 Industry Leaders
Top ranked firms
Each of the 100 firms was rated through the eyes of a law firm’s external target audience and measured against 100+ criteria, including several new metrics covering engagement (website functionality and the social media channels used) and evidence (brand and content on website and social media). Below reveals each law firm's engagement, evidence and total score, along with their ranking and classification.
If you are interested in scheduling a meeting with our research and creative specialists to gain insights into your firm's performance or to explore how your brand and digital presence could benefit from a tailored Ratings analysis, please reach out to Mark Stephenson.
Hogan Lovells
Overall score: 86.08%
- = Engagement
- = Evidence
Reed Smith
Overall score: 82.08%
- = Engagement
- = Evidence
Akin
Overall score: 81.42%
- = Engagement
- = Evidence
Key
| 2026 Rankings | Firm name | 2025 Rankings | Law.com Top 200, 2026 | Score /1200 | Overall % score | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
4
|
Sheppard | 90 | 58 | 957 | 79.75% |
D
|
|
5
|
Troutman Pepper Locke | 69 | 62 | 916 | 76.33% |
D
|
|
6
|
Husch Blackwell | 96 | 915 | 76.25% |
D
|
|
|
7
|
Bird & Bird | 3 | 91 | 911 | 75.92% |
D
|
|
8
|
Simmons & Simmons | 15 | 84 | 909 | 75.75% |
D
|
|
9
|
Pinsent Masons | 6 | 76 | 894 | 74.50% |
F
|
|
10
|
Mayer Brown | 4 | 33 | 890 | 74.17% |
F
|
|
11
|
Squire Patton Boggs | 59 | 50 | 883 | 73.58% |
E
|
|
12
|
Addleshaw Goddard | 50 | 97 | 876 | 73.00% |
E
|
|
13
|
Eversheds Sutherland | 8 | 39 | 875 | 72.92% |
F
|
|
14
|
DLA Piper | 5 | 3 | 872 | 72.67% |
F
|
|
15
|
Freshfields | 11 | 13 | 864 | 72.00% |
F
|
|
16
|
Seyfarth Shaw | 7 | 73 | 861 | 71.75% |
E
|
|
17
|
Gowling WLG | 13 | 88 | 847 | 70.58% |
E
|
|
18
|
Linklaters | 48 | 14 | 840 | 70.00% |
E
|
|
19
|
Cooley | 61 | 29 | 834 | 69.50% |
F
|
|
20
|
Vinson & Elkins | 32 | 70 | 833 | 69.42% |
E
|
|
21
|
Littler Mendelson | 85 | 92 | 830 | 69.17% |
F
|
|
22
|
Covington & Burling | 18 | 36 | 829 | 69.08% |
E
|
|
23
|
A&O Shearman | 30 | 4 | 828 | 69.00% |
E
|
|
24
|
O'Melveny & Myers | 42 | 67 | 821 | 68.42% |
F
|
|
25
|
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | 9 | 79 | 819 | 68.25% |
E
|
|
26
|
Hunton Andrews Kurth | 39 | 75 | 816 | 68.00% |
E
|
|
27
|
Clifford Chance | 33 | 12 | 808 | 67.33% |
E
|
|
28
|
Dentons | 53 | 18 | 807 | 67.25% |
E
|
|
29
|
McDermott Will & Schutle | 31 | 28 | 803 | 66.92% |
F
|
|
30
|
Orrick | 49 | 42 | 802 | 66.83% |
E
|
|
31
|
CMS | 14 | 26 | 802 | 66.83% |
E
|
|
32
|
Ashurst | 10 | 53 | 801 | 66.75% |
F
|
|
33
|
Slaughter and May | 20 | 77 | 799 | 66.58% |
E
|
|
34
|
Sidley Austin | 25 | 7 | 796 | 66.33% |
F
|
|
35
|
Baker McKenzie | 12 | 9 | 793 | 66.08% |
F
|
|
36
|
White & Case | 19 | 10 | 790 | 65.83% |
E
|
|
37
|
Clyde & Co. | 51 | 66 | 786 | 65.50% |
F
|
|
38
|
Morrison & Foerster | 22 | 47 | 775 | 64.58% |
F
|
|
39
|
Fox Rothschild | 29 | 85 | 773 | 64.42% |
F
|
|
40
|
Fragomen | 17 | 74 | 770 | 64.17% |
F
|
|
41
|
Perkins Coie | 16 | 56 | 761 | 63.42% |
F
|
|
42
|
Wilson Sonsini | 58 | 46 | 758 | 63.17% |
E
|
|
43
|
Norton Rose Fulbright | 46 | 24 | 751 | 62.58% |
F
|
|
44
|
Morgan Lewis | 36 | 11 | 750 | 62.50% |
F
|
|
45
|
Taft | 98 | 749 | 62.42% |
F
|
|
|
46
|
Latham & Watkins | 37 | 2 | 747 | 62.25% |
F
|
|
47
|
Goodwin Procter | 26 | 23 | 746 | 62.17% |
F
|
|
48
|
Polsinelli | 23 | 71 | 744 | 62.00% |
E
|
|
49
|
Herbert Smith Freehills | 44 | 37 | 742 | 61.83% |
F
|
|
50
|
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani | 62 | 86 | 740 | 61.67% |
E
|
|
51
|
Baker & Hostetler | 68 | 69 | 739 | 61.58% |
E
|
|
52
|
Fenwick | 27 | 83 | 736 | 61.33% |
F
|
|
53
|
Foley & Lardner | 38 | 54 | 728 | 60.67% |
F
|
|
54
|
Venable | 75 | 80 | 718 | 59.83% |
L
|
|
55
|
Blakes | 35 | 94 | 711 | 59.25% |
L
|
|
56
|
Mintz | 34 | 99 | 709 | 59.08% |
L
|
|
57
|
Proskauer Rose | 43 | 49 | 699 | 58.25% |
L
|
|
58
|
Fried Frank | 21 | 63 | 698 | 58.17% |
L
|
|
59
|
Davis Polk | 74 | 21 | 697 | 58.08% |
L
|
|
60
|
Weill | 54 | 32 | 694 | 57.83% |
L
|
|
61
|
Winston & Strawn | 64 | 55 | 688 | 57.33% |
L
|
|
62
|
Dechert | 77 | 43 | 687 | 57.25% |
L
|
|
63
|
Arnold & Porter | 47 | 61 | 686 | 57.17% |
L
|
|
64
|
Paul, Weiss | 86 | 19 | 682 | 56.83% |
L
|
|
65
|
K&L Gates | 65 | 52 | 674 | 56.17% |
L
|
|
66
|
Jackson Lewis | 40 | 100 | 668 | 55.67% |
L
|
|
67
|
Barnes & Thornburg | 67 | 89 | 665 | 55.42% |
L
|
|
68
|
Alston & Bird | 56 | 51 | 659 | 54.92% |
L
|
|
69
|
McGuireWoods | 70 | 64 | 658 | 54.83% |
L
|
|
70
|
Ropes & Gray | 82 | 8 | 657 | 54.75% |
L
|
|
71
|
Ogletree | 45 | 93 | 651 | 54.25% |
L
|
|
72
|
Jones Day | 76 | 17 | 649 | 54.08% |
L
|
|
73
|
Holland & Knight | 55 | 31 | 642 | 53.50% |
L
|
|
74
|
Wilmer | 79 | 41 | 627 | 52.25% |
L
|
|
75
|
Greenberg Traurig | 24 | 20 | 623 | 51.92% |
L
|
|
76
|
Kirkland & Ellis | 66 | 1 | 622 | 51.83% |
L
|
|
77
|
Paul Hastings | 57 | 27 | 619 | 51.58% |
L
|
|
78
|
Simpson Thacher | 72 | 16 | 617 | 51.42% |
L
|
|
79
|
Nelson Mullins | 83 | 72 | 616 | 51.33% |
L
|
|
80
|
King & Spalding | 93 | 25 | 615 | 51.25% |
L
|
|
81
|
Cleary Gottlieb | 71 | 38 | 606 | 50.50% |
L
|
|
82
|
Cozen O'Connor | 80 | 95 | 601 | 50.08% |
L
|
|
83
|
Lewis Brisbois | 87 | 87 | 601 | 50.08% |
L
|
|
84
|
Quinn Emanuel | 95 | 22 | 598 | 49.83% |
L
|
|
85
|
Gibson Dunn | 91 | 6 | 592 | 49.33% |
L
|
|
86
|
Milbank | 52 | 34 | 591 | 49.25% |
L
|
|
87
|
Pillsbury | 63 | 82 | 586 | 48.83% |
L
|
|
88
|
Willkie | 88 | 35 | 583 | 48.58% |
L
|
|
89
|
Sullivan & Cromwell | 92 | 30 | 580 | 48.33% |
L
|
|
90
|
Baker Botts | 73 | 81 | 572 | 47.67% |
L
|
|
91
|
King & Wood Mallesons | 78 | 57 | 563 | 46.92% |
L
|
|
92
|
Faegre Drinker | 84 | 68 | 561 | 46.75% |
L
|
|
93
|
Blank Rome | 81 | 90 | 536 | 44.67% |
L
|
|
94
|
Katten | 89 | 78 | 531 | 44.25% |
L
|
|
95
|
Skadden | 60 | 5 | 530 | 44.17% |
L
|
|
96
|
Cravath | 97 | 59 | 510 | 42.50% |
L
|
|
97
|
Debevoise & Plimpton | 96 | 40 | 475 | 39.58% |
L
|
|
98
|
Yingke | 48 | 350 | 29.17% |
L
|
|
|
99
|
Kim & Chang | 65 | 339 | 28.25% |
L
|
|
|
100
|
Wachtell Lipton | 99 | 60 | 334 | 27.83% |
L
|
Note: The 100 firms rated in our analysis are taken from the ' 2025 Global 200 ranked by revenue' released by Law.com. Firms ranked 90th or below by Law.com may appear in our Living Ratings analysis one year, but not the next, as each firm's revenue changes. If your law firm was in our 2025 analysis but not in this year's, please contact us for a bespoke Ratings.